pull down to refresh

Unable to find 3I/ATLAS information, research or news that’s not coming from Avi Loeb. ☄️

Feel free to drop any links. Been searching endlessly for the past week.

Possible alien tech eh? Im pretty out of my league here so idk if this helps but I gathered these:


1. Official / “boring but solid” info (no Loeb)1. Official / “boring but solid” info (no Loeb)


2. Peer-reviewed papers & preprints (non-Loeb authors)2. Peer-reviewed papers & preprints (non-Loeb authors)

Discovery & basic physical propertiesDiscovery & basic physical properties

Activity, dust & gasActivity, dust & gas

Origin, age & galactic contextOrigin, age & galactic context

  • Maggiolo et al. – “Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS: Evidence for Galactic Cosmic Ray Processing”
    Cosmic-ray–altered outer layers, age estimates of several Gyr, implications for composition.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26308 ([arXiv][13])
  • Pérez-Couto et al. – “3I/ATLAS: In Search of the Witnesses to Its Voyage”
    Back-traces its trajectory through the Galaxy, looks for candidate stellar encounters.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07678 ([arXiv][14])

Direct responses to the “alien probe” angle (non-Loeb)Direct responses to the “alien probe” angle (non-Loeb)

  • Haque – “Why 3I/ATLAS is Not an Alien Probe” (EarthArxiv)
    Walks through dynamics, non-gravitational acceleration, and why standard comet physics suffices.
    https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/9820/ ([EarthArXiv][15])
  • Hibberd – “Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology?” (arXiv)
    Dark-forest style thought-experiment; not Loeb, but engages with that hypothesis from another angle.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12213 ([arXiv][16])

3. JWST / SPHEREx / multi-telescope coverage3. JWST / SPHEREx / multi-telescope coverage



5. Imagery, observing & amateur work5. Imagery, observing & amateur work

reply