pull down to refresh

6 sats \ 6 replies \ @Scoresby OP 12 Nov \ on: Past transactions that violate BIP 444 Reduce Data Temporary Soft Fork rules bitcoin

Dathon Ohm responds further:

source

write
preview
471 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 12 Nov

phew they're only poor people

reply
105 sats \ 4 replies \ @Scoresby OP 12 Nov

in my mind, any amount of fucking with people's money is unacceptable.

I'll admit though that I often have a kind of zealot mindset where I put things in black and white terms.

reply
212 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 12 Nov

Same and same.

But this is in fact ridiculous. I wish they'd hurry up and save bitcoin, so we can get to the 'find out' part and stop all the squealing.

reply
542 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 12 Nov

I wish these guys, in all honesty and sincerity, would just fork off so they can 'save' Bitcoin.

I run multiple Core nodes that I actually use they tell me what Bitcoin is. I don't need internet influencers to do that with 'temporary changes' that freeze coins based on their 'saving things'.

I wish all Human beings good will and good fortune... however to these guys good riddance.

reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @Row 12 Nov

Can't be zealous enough on the best money we've invented so far... in all of history. Not a single sat can be sacrificed to false gods.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Row 12 Nov

Do I sound zealous enough?

reply