pull down to refresh
222 sats \ 2 replies \ @deSign_r 18h \ on: The good old toxic Bitcoin maximalists culture
Better find a new definition, because today bitcoin toxic maximalists are no maximalists, nor toxic, and probably not eve bitcoiners. Like the term cypherpunks, these terms define something specific in a determinate period in time. That time has ended, and anything else outside that period simply become marketing propaganda to attract those that missed the train when the terms were coined.
Nice poster ~Design!
The time has ended.
I hope not. But your point about terms having currency and meaning and then becoming (perhaps inevitably) distorted when they are used beyond that time frame does make sense. Perhaps it's just a term that we'll have to abandon. But I'm not yet ready to give up the fight.
reply
The term bitconers will be always there, I think it is important to define it properly, before it gets misunderstood (even more).
Today bitcoin is synonym of crypto for the majority of people. If a fight is needed, it would be the fight to add a proper bitcoin and bitcoiner definition in the worldwide dictionaries.
This way does not get confused with paper-bitcoiners, suitcoiners, trustcoiners, cryptophilies, retarded-traders, etc...
reply