pull down to refresh

Forgive me, but I can't help thinking... What the hell are people who support Gaza thinking? Have they forgotten that the people living there are terrorists who cut off babies' heads and kidnap people to maintain their terrorist regime? After what they did on October 7, they obviously deserve total eradication.
On the other hand, Milei obviously sides with Israel. In a world where you're either with Israel or Palestine, you obviously can't be in favor of terrorists (Palestine = Hamas).
With regard to the central bank, Milei calmed the rampant, uncontrolled inflation that the previous party (the disgusting communists) had.
Closing the bank is illogical. If they do that, they should adopt another country's currency, and losing sovereignty and control of their money is the worst thing a country can do. (It would be like selling your car and relying on your neighbor to drive you to work and everywhere else you need to go.) It's too complex an issue. And in Argentina, the only ones complaining about Milei are the leftist parasites who lived off the state, and now their source of income has been cut off.
user is confused by the Hegelian dialectic of state propaganda; doesn't matter which side the user picks in this case - both are managed by evil corporations, so that's why the issue appears "complex;"
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @flat24 16h
Obviously, it's a pretty complex issue, and there are many things going on that aren't open to the general public like us.
We are the common people, and the common people are never really aware of how things work in the world around them.
Gaza and Palestine are not states that seek stability or progress for their inhabitants. Gaza is a training ground for terrorists and a place designed for that purpose, to spread terror (there are innocent people there who have nothing to do with the terrorists), yes, that is very true, no one chooses where they are born. But most of the people who are there today are the same ones who in the past supported Hamas taking over and ruling the area. So what can they complain about today? I think absolutely nothing.
reply
States are businesses; the most profitable business in this day and age is that of destruction & distraction; the very people who follow orders and get paid to follow orders are responsible for the effects of the business; politicians merely scribble some spells on paper;
so who is sick enough to follow destructive orders? u are correct, terror-ists: people who hate themselves, brought up in suffering and not raised properly by the community from which they come; their rationale is roughly as follows: "i have suffered, therefore i will cause suffering;"
there is also an occult meaning behind the practice of terrorism: if u listen closely to politicians like Bush, he says "terra-ists" and "war on terra:" literally a war on people of earth; the average conscious mind does not perceive this spell, but the subconscious does;
more thots here: #1278219
thank for being open to discussing this issue
reply
Exactly.
Only detail I have to add is that closing the central bank is planned. The idiocy of those who remark that he didn't on day zero (which Miley always remarked he wouldn't do) lies in their will to ignore the entire world and everything prior and everything after: the previous communist regimes used the central bank to incur in massive debt to support their populist schemes. Debts that have to be repaid prior to closing it. Being something so blatantly obvious and simple, it speaks volumes of those who can't grasp it, like Saifedean. Above all, state debt is not only to foreign creditors, but to creditors in the country itself, who bought state emitted bonds. Imagine closing the central bank before paying back to locals, stealing from millions on day one, what a great start.
Another important detail is that the central bank being closed do not means loss of sovereignty, since the intent is not to depend on a foreign central bank, but simply allow people to commerce in whatever currency they want. That is, as Milei always made clear, the intent is to advance to an open-banking system. People will choose the currency that suits them for their needs. A first step towards that is having in place a currency that's not the peso, since there should be no central bank to emit it, and thus there's a first need to have a new first reference, for which the dollar is the clear option. Dollarizing is the plan, to allow the complete dissolution of the central bank, to then proceed to an open-banking system, in which people will chose the currency they want freely. This also means, as it's Milei's wish, that even private currency mints could arise.
reply
Good goy slop.
reply