pull down to refresh
542 sats \ 14 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Nov \ on: Trump Administration Admits It Doesn’t Know Who Exactly It’s Killing in Boats Politics_And_Law
That's the norm for war, right?
If people are figuring out that's a problem, I'm not complaining.
It's okay when Obama does it
reply
2 wrongs make a "who cares?"
reply
Did I say that?
reply
no but some people do imply that
reply
What isn't?
reply
There is no evidentiary burden to meet or fulfill
reply
How so? They're accused of criminal activity. That's supposed to be followed by presentation of evidence.
reply
It’s a military strike against enemy combatants
reply
Uh huh...I feel like I missed the Congressional declaration of war against a particular enemy.
Why in the world would you take their word for something like that? All they do is lie about this stuff.
How do you know they were enemy combatants without any evidence to support that?
In what sense are they enemy combatants if they're not attacking America?
reply
Consider the source, the intercept which is no longer credible post Glenn Greenwald
reply
I don't disagree with you there, but the alternative is giving the US government the benefit of the doubt.
What experience from this century suggests they deserve that?
reply
mRNA?
anyway, the article mentions Venezuela zero times but Venezuela is in the URL
reply