pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Filiprogrammer 18h \ on: Would regular Bitcoin transactions remain unaffected by BIP444-related reorgs? bitcoin
If a transaction doesn’t use OP_RETURN or any nonstandard script types, it should still be considered valid under both the old and new consensus rules. That means such “normal” transactions could exist in both mempools (of nodes that follow BIP444 and those that don’t) and wouldn’t cause reorg-related issues even in a mixed network. Am I thinking about this correctly in that standard transactions are effectively immune to any BIP444-induced reorgs because they sit in the intersection of both rule sets with high enough fees?
Yes, regular monetary transactions are unaffected by BIP444.
The soft fork would only limit the ways to put big chunks of data into transactions. (OP_RETURN, Inscriptions...)
write
preview
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @ellipticKurve256k1 OP 11h
Thk. Then there should be no concern as long as people proceed with standard transactions
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Filiprogrammer 2h
Exactly. This would only impact spammers (NFTs, BRC-20 tokens...). It would not stop Runes (Shitcoins encoded in small OP_RETURNs) btw.
reply