pull down to refresh

141 sats \ 2 replies \ @petertodd 31 Oct \ parent \ on: Review of Jimmy Song v. Peter Todd filters debate (Plan ₿ Lugano) bitcoin
That's exactly what my OFAC point was getting at. The end-point of what the pro-filter crowd wants is dynamically adjusted blacklists. Which is exactly what the pro-OFAC crowd also wants.
They're the same thing.
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @000w2 31 Oct
What a ridiculous straw man. Individual nodes determine their own relay policy regardless of what anyone says. Any filtering that happens at the network level is an emergent phenomenon.
reply
151 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 31 Oct
It's important the audience realizes Pedo Todd is a state cuck. Biggest takeaway from this debate for me was Pedo Todd refusing to admonish csam when pressed, and saying he wouldn't look it up to verify because of the status of its legality, not any moral reasons. Pedo Todd is a psychopath
reply