pull down to refresh

So morons are still buying NFTs and people are trying to do them on Bitcoin?

Great. /s

reply

deleted by author

"Effectively, there is no longer any technical limit on bitcoin data storage."

Yeah go ahead and try shitcoiner

reply

You've always been able to publish as much data as you want, up to the blocksize limit. It's just very expensive....

FWIW I've had publishing text as an example program for my python-bitcoinlib library for years: https://github.com/petertodd/python-bitcoinlib/blob/master/examples/publish-text.py

You can see published text here: https://bitcoinstrings.com/

reply

this oversight of taproot let you store arbitrary data on bitcoin at 75% fee discount because the jpg is part of the witness data.

reply

So? The discount accurately reflects the lesser cost to the network of non-utxo-set data. And P2SH is no different. You can publish as much data as you want with P2SH too. Just use more inputs. Doesn't make it much more expensive.

reply

right… seems important to me that non-financial tx are given substantially more discount than simple financial tx on a network meant to accommodate financial tx and with limited blockspace.

reply

Not much of the blockchain is taken up by people publishing data. It's a non-issue.

reply

ordinals has been on mainnet for four days.

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

Right but still a technical limit and an expensive one.

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

my pfp is on ur full node

reply

congrats kid, there's still a technical limit on bitcoin data storage.

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

Interesting article

I have been wondering how to put a song onto the base layer so that it will be stored 4EVA!

How would one do this? A link to a website might not exist in a few decades if the owner doesn't pay the hosting fee

reply

deleted by author

We will never be able to get away from this.

I still think something like BitDNS is a good idea, honestly. At least it’s useful and important instead of JPEGs.

reply

deleted by author

I didn't see @pourteaux here, if I did I'd have redirected the sats his/her way.

The lesson here is that if you write a solid piece, you share it on Stacker News ASAP, because otherwise someone else will.

But since @pourteaux is new here, I just sent some funds your way 😉

reply

Also probably good to cc @rodarmor while we are at it :)

reply

deleted by author

thanks sir- glad you enjoyed it

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

I'm not interested in hearing about this until blocks are so full it is actually a problem

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author