pull down to refresh

In response to @billytheked's prompt for memoirs about fighting for freedom (#1267544), i decided to make this post.
This is also related to an old @cryotosensei's post about his friend struggling with whether to take a pay cut for a job with lower stress and better fit (#920156); and @elvismercury's recent post about quitting his job to find something better for himself (#1267318)
I think it's something we can all relate to.

From success to failure

If you've read some of my posts, you'll know that I often say that I teach at a "non-elite" public university.
What you may not know is why I emphasize that so much. It's because I used to teach at an elite university. My first job out of grad school was in a top 20-ranked R1 research university. I had the best academic placement out of my graduating class. I'm not saying this to brag, but to put my experiences in context.
For a variety of reasons, I wasn't able to find success at my first academic job. I had trouble publishing in the prestigious journals that they required me to publish in. A lot of it was my own fault---a naivity about what editors and referees are looking for, and honestly just not putting in enough effort to network with top researchers in the field.
Because of my lack of publishing success, I wasn't able to get tenure in my first academic job. In academia, tenure is an "up or out" system---meaning if you don't get tenure you can't stay in the job. So I had to look for work elsewhere. I could have moved to another R1 institution probably, but that would have required moving to another city... and I had two kids and a wife who were all pretty settled in where we were.
So I decided to limit my job search to my city. This resulted in me taking a job at a much lower ranked university, which also meant a corresponding pay-cut. The pay-cut was quite significant, it was in the 25%-30% range. And remember, academic salaries aren't that good to begin with, so this was quite a painful change to absorb.

From failure to opportunity

For a while, I saw myself as something of a failure. My friends from grad school were getting tenure or promoted and moving up the ladder, whereas it seemed like I was the only one moving downwards.
But the new job came with some hidden blessings. Because the pressure to publish was a lot less, I now had more time to explore other interests. I could also be choosy about what research projects to engage in: no longer did I feel (as much) pressure to publish just for the sake of publishing; I could now choose to only work on projects that I actually cared about, rather than scrambling to publish what others wanted to see.
This resulted in me having more time to explore a range of other things like:
  • Work part time for a tech company
  • Do consulting work
  • Build my first bitcoin node
  • Contribute to Stacker News
  • Engage in research projects that interest me, but aren't clear candidates for top journal pubs (like the current SN research project I'm engaged with)
These are all things that have shaped me into who I am now. Having a wider range of experiences, I am more confident in my abilities as an economist now than if I had stayed in the R1 university, because my perspectives and skillsets are broader now than they would have been otherwise.

How I know I'm free

Before I had this experience, I would say that I was shackled to someone's else's idea of what life should be. I evaluated myself according to the expectations of others. After this experience, I realized that I'm answerable only to myself, my family, and God.
I still don't make that much money, but there are a few indicators that I can look at and know that I've found real freedom.
  • I'm not always looking forward to the next vacation. Vacations are nice, but day to day life is actually better.
  • I'm not afraid to lose my job. I have enough projects and interests outside the job that losing it will just feel like an opportunity to explore something new.
  • I'm participating in the world of Bitcoin. You can't truly be free unless you have money that's free.
In a way, these three facts make me think I'm probably freer than most of my more successful (on paper) peers. I suppose the advice I'd give a younger version of myself is, "Don't be tied to what others expect from you. Find out what interests you and pursue that. And don't just pursue it as a career. Pursue it as a way of life, such that you no longer even feel the desire to get away from it, and even if the career is taken away from you, you'd still find a way to keep doing what you love."
It's easier said than done. I realize that not everyone even knows what they want at that level, especially young people. But I think if you can say that you've found that, then you can say you've found freedom. (And of course, buy bitcoin too)
this territory is moderated
141 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 28 Oct
This is inspiring for many reasons. It's crazy that when you pursue a career path there is a whole closed culture defining what success is. You get so caught up in it that you never consider the possibility that creating your own path can be more satisfying and rewarding, and sometimes even in the financial sense. The peer pressure to conform can be intense. I saw that among my friends who were top law students. The most "successful" spent years slaving in the prestigious firms, with no time for family or even time to spend all the money they were making.
reply
closed culture defining what success is
That's an extremely good way of putting it. I'm glad I got out of it. I think if I had actually been successful in the closed culture, I would have ended up a narrower, less happy person.
reply
This is a really great post. I'm glad for your response.
A lot of it was my own fault---a naivity about what editors and referees are looking for, and honestly just not putting in enough effort to network with top researchers in the field.
One thought I had when reading this section was that I don't believe it is your fault, even if you were "naive" as to the expectation of these journals. The sad thing I noticed with academia during my stint was that it always felt like the higher you climb, the more out of touch you become, and the more you have to pander. Many of my tenured profs always came off as stuffy and a little distant.
Your students are lucky to have a professor who is none of those things.
reply
Your students are lucky to have a professor who is none of those things.
I actually think I come off as stuffy and distant to many students. Something I'm working on and recently got inspired by a colleague after watching how he builds rapport with students
reply
What do university students know anyway? Are they undergrads? It's very possible I was wrong back in the day about some of the profs.
The fact that you are working on it says a lot, not to mention your Pleb Economist series.
reply
Yep, undergrads. And yeah it's hard for the students and profs to necessarily vibe with each other. I think what my colleague taught me is: don't be afraid to go off on tangents about your own interests. It humanizes you with the students. I try to stay too straight-laced and on-track with the curriculum.
reply
I'm guessing you probably don't have to worry about going too off-topic since your instinct is to stay on-track.
Personally I can recall learning a lot from teachers' tangents. Sound advice.
reply
It's strange how so many fields have that kind of signature, where the handful of elites in that field are just so absolutely tailored to the ecology.
In my experience, they're usually driven and conscientious (e.g., they have their shit together to remarkable degree) but they almost are never the smartest, most creative and interesting. Maybe this is a property of all exploiters, in any niche? Being an absolute master at speedrunning the level tells you much less than it seems; yet they are the face of "winning" and set the standard for what people think of when they think about success.
Anyway, the level of academia you've found strikes me as pretty great. Gives me something to shoot for.
reply
Running? Back to basics ->#1256634
Elite Metaprograms (Open-Source Genius Edition)
Most people run on Windows 95—chasing likes, titles, the external pat on the back! The elite?
They’re rewriting the OS from scratch like alpha conversion in lambda calculus.
Some people sort for sameness, debugging against the crowd’s blue screen of approval. Some people compile from vision with one eye in the future, too many feet in the past, never fully trusting an internal GPS so precise it turns practice into ritual like the law of attraction on steroids; TRT?
Skills -> inevitable implementation !
The difference isn’t necessarily the hardware, the source code, nor the ship that one has to swim too! No trophies, no rewards! Just a reality so vivid the world installs updates on the dolphins back.
reply
Hmm, speed-running is an apt comparison. You need a certain level of determination and drive, and even sacrifice. Not everyone is willing or able to do that and that's okay.
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 18h
pressure to publish just for the sake of publishing
This feels to me like the game in academia. For a while I edited dissertations for people who were in PhD and masters programs for shitty online universities (inevitably in some form of social studies, psychology, or anthropology). These were basically pay to play affairs where people bought a degree. But they had to publish a dissertation. And so they came up with some tired thing that wasn't any good and it all felt so bleh. Probably because they weren't writing for anyone, really; they were just writing to publish.
I saw this from Orson Scott Card today:
There is no "going to be a writer." There's only writing. While you write, you ARE a writer. If audiences respond well, you're a GOOD writer. There's no other standard. No meaningful credentials. No college degree that makes it official. If you dream of being a writer (which I never did) then you're a dreamer. But if you write, regardless of your attitude or training, you're a writer.
I'd hazard the same is true of most things: it's the doing of them that's important, and who they affect -- the trappings of elite or not, official or not, recognized or not -- don't matter.
reply
I like that. I heard similar advice about guitar: "If you play guitar, you're a guitarist. You don't have to be a certain level."
dissertations for people who were in PhD and masters programs for shitty online universities (inevitably in some form of social studies, psychology, or anthropology)
I'd argue that even for non-shitty in-person universities, a lot of the degrees being churned out are pretty worthless.
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @Signal312 23h
Great write up.
And those papers that didn't get published - they probably wouldn't have been read anyway, right? You probably get more readers, writing up posts on Stacker News
reply
They would have been read within the "closed culture" that siggy mentioned in this thread. But probably not by anyone outside it.
reply
it is quite interesting that you have concluded that after such a long academic career and through all of these intellect years. so i think that you made an interesting insight of which success mainly is not about prestige or salary matter but it is far deeper that all of that . it is a personal fullfillement and i hope that you may find that key in whatever in point you are.
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @Taft 28 Oct
I like the idea that true freedom is both spiritual and practical, even economic (“buy bitcoin too”).
reply
Thanks for tagging me, and I’m glad my humble musing resonated with you n apparently stuck. (Note to self: check in with the friend whom I based my post on!)
I think it’s awesome that you have made yourself more antifragile with your other two avenues of income. Job security is a myth these days n I think just knowing how to earn money elsewhere bolsters confidence in a way that job success and prestige just cannot replicate.
As we move into our 40-50s, we may find ourselves thinking more about legacy. Seems like your Stacker News project could be a way to do that
共勉之
reply
Freedom is true wealth. Most people are slaves.
reply