pull down to refresh

33 sats \ 6 replies \ @optimism 27 Oct \ parent \ on: The Essential Role of Open Source in Sovereign AI AI
Ah, yes, thanks. I have overlooked the "industry" segmentation there. It only confuses me more though: if the largest group are IT service providers, then why do they defer in majority? I mean for example this:
write
preview
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 27 Oct
What I’m getting from that chart is IT providers basically saying the government should hand the cash to the companies! Hahaha
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 27 Oct
As in: "y'all give us money to develop nationally sovereign AI"? I mean that's actually likely, but that's a surprisingly weak attitude at the same time.
Are we all just milking the public now?
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @SimpleStacker 27 Oct
Haha, wow was this a poll of government workers? sheesh
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 27 Oct
Yeah so that's what I thought but they say 44% are IT service providers, and 4% is government!
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 27 Oct
Ok, wait after looking again I see the term "sovereign AI". I don't know what that means
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 27 Oct
Nearly four out of five organizations call AI sovereignty a strategic priority, and 90% cite open source as essential to achieving it.
From this perspective I'd say sovereign from the perspective of the business. But this may be confusing too, because they then continue on to talk about global vs sovereign, which would imply national level sovereignty.
But why would a corporation be nationalist? Makes no sense.
reply