Dont feel any need to reject the label as I do not see it as a negative thing to acknowledge the state is still an important and highly functional means of human organisation which though flawed, just as people themselves are, achieves considerable net gains for billions of people. Do find it amusing how Libertarians are actually demonstrably so tribal and unaware of their hypocrisy, ganging up on any opposing viewpoint rather than engaging in respectful reasoned debate which would be a minimum requirement for human interaction were there not a state and it was hoped/expected to avoid complete chaos and tyranny. You are assuming humans are evolved far beyond where they actually are, and your inability to engage in respectful reasoned dialogue and debate are proof of that.