pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @Scoresby OP 23 Oct \ parent \ on: "Quasi-consensus": help me understand this conversation with Chris Guida bitcoin
I agree that consensus rules need to change, but I disagree that mempool policies are useful to any great extent (and I certainly don't think they are worth getting worked up over).
While I don't think "Bitcoin came to be and succeeded," I do think Satoshi managed to get a few key elements in place and that started this whole thing off. I'll settle for filter proponents suggesting a change to block validation rules and standing by it.
Let's do it. Would you like to contribute and spread the word about the idea, perhaps? I am going to contribute on the technical side and I already openes the discussion on the Bitcoin-dev mailing list.
reply
reply
Peer-to-peer resilience 💪.
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAMHHROwJA5N%3DSfejF353oWFFsKVCtk5cpr9QkOv%2BZcqGDFz6oA%40mail.gmail.com
I'll settle for their suggestion. Personally o don't think the issue is worth changing consensus rules.
But I'd respect the argument a lot more if that is what they were proposing. Good luck.
reply
If you settle for "filter proponents suggesting a change to block validation rules and standing by it" then the respect for the argument for the need of mempool policy rules comes logically, doesn't it?
reply
deleted by author