pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @Scoresby OP 21h \ parent \ on: "Quasi-consensus": help me understand this conversation with Chris Guida bitcoin
I agree that consensus rules need to change, but I disagree that mempool policies are useful to any great extent (and I certainly don't think they are worth getting worked up over).
While I don't think "Bitcoin came to be and succeeded," I do think Satoshi managed to get a few key elements in place and that started this whole thing off. I'll settle for filter proponents suggesting a change to block validation rules and standing by it.
write
preview
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @gregtonoski 21h
Let's do it. Would you like to contribute and spread the word about the idea, perhaps? I am going to contribute on the technical side and I already openes the discussion on the Bitcoin-dev mailing list.
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 9h
I already openes the discussion on the Bitcoin-dev mailing list.
Link?
I applaud your effort to fork off.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @gregtonoski 8h
Peer-to-peer resilience 💪. https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAMHHROwJA5N%3DSfejF353oWFFsKVCtk5cpr9QkOv%2BZcqGDFz6oA%40mail.gmail.com
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8h
I am not your peer, I want you to fork off.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @gregtonoski 7h
That's okay. 💪
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 21h
I'll settle for their suggestion. Personally o don't think the issue is worth changing consensus rules.
But I'd respect the argument a lot more if that is what they were proposing. Good luck.
reply