pull down to refresh

When El Salvador announced Bitcoin as legal tender, the world held its breath. Many people they thought it was the long-awaited “nation-state adoption” moment — the spark that would ignite a global Bitcoin revolution. But years later, reality speaks differently. The truth is simple but uncomfortable: the approach was all wrong.
Bitcoin doesn’t need governments, banks, or corporations to bless it with legitimacy. It was born to outlive them. It thrives not in the halls of policy makers, but in the hands of free individuals.

El Salvador got it all wrong trying to make Bitcoin a government program, a legal frameworks, a national project. But Bitcoin it is not a policy; it’s a personal awakening. It’s the moment an individual realize that they can be free and responsible for their own decisions and actions, without permission. It’s the silent revolution to became sovereign individuals — to exit matrix.
No governments can legislate that mindset. You can’t enforces sovereignty through a decree.

Most people they still believe the myth that smoother regulations and friendlier laws will lead to Bitcoin adoption. That’s all wrong. In truth, it’s the opposite. The worst regulations are what make the strongest bitcoiners.
When people are cornered by the system, they learn. They study Bitcoin because they have no other choice. They learn to exit the system, to build parallel economies, to trust themselves over institutions.

Bitcoin will never become a “legal tender” in any country or nation— not in El Salvador, not anywhere. And it doesn’t need to. Legal tender laws belong to the same system, from which Bitcoin was designed to free the people from.
Bitcoin is independent money for independent people. It exists outside borders, beyond politics, immune to decrees. No parliament, president, or central bank can define it.
When you use Bitcoin, you’re not following a government mandate. You’re expressing freedom.
El Salvador’s experiment was a lesson, not a failure. It showed the world that Bitcoin cannot be adopted by governments nor institutions— it must be individuals. You don’t make people sovereign by passing a law. They become sovereign by choice.
The approach was all wrong because Bitcoin was never meant to be a government or institutions or corporations project. It was meant to be a human one.
Bitcoin doesn’t need nations, doesn't need governments, doesn't need instructions or corporations, to succeed. It only needs individuals to wake up.
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fenix 9h
This is one of many situations in which bitcoin was proposed as the solution and then soon forgotten by those same people who had tasted financial sovereignty and felt the weight of responsibility. They abandon that sovereignty for the comfort of fiduciary slavery. Still, I hope some real bitcoiners emerge from that kind of experience, because what they show is that bitcoin isn't for everyone, but it is open to everyone.
reply