pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @sudonaka 13 Oct \ parent \ on: The REAL reason for removing the OP_RETURN 80-byte limit bitcoin
Oh yes higher fees are good for on-chain payments adoption. 🤡
write
preview
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 13 Oct
I'm not saying that. I am asking why are people not using the protocol for payments? Can you answer that question? 🤡
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 14 Oct
fees are good for on-chain payments adoption.
Yes, people bidding over blockspace is good for bitcoin. This is the way Bitcoin is designed. To complain about it is to say "adoption is bad for adoption."
If it is bad, how do we even proceed?
reply
777 sats \ 0 replies \ @sudonaka 23h
“Good for Bitcoin” -bitcoin doesn’t care.
WE CARE, if it’s $200 to open a lightning channel because of shitcoiners clogging the chain- LESS PEOPLE WILL USE IT FOR BTC
But you think all adoption is good, so you should enjoy the shitcoins on Bitcoin network and also way higher fees
reply