57 studies from 35 cohorts were included in the systematic review and 31 studies from 24 cohorts were included in meta-analyses. For all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease incidence, dementia, and falls, an inverse non-linear dose-response association was found, with inflection points at around 5000–7000 steps per day. An inverse linear association was found for cardiovascular disease mortality, cancer incidence, cancer mortality, type 2 diabetes incidence, and depressive symptoms. Based on our meta-analyses, compared with 2000 steps per day, 7000 steps per day was associated with a 47% lower risk of all-cause mortality, a 25% lower risk of cardiovascular disease incidence, a 47% lower risk of cardiovascular disease mortality, a non-significant 6% lower risk of cancer incidence, a 37% lower risk of cancer mortality, a 14% lower risk of type 2 diabetes, a 38% lower risk of dementia, a 22% lower risk of depressive symptoms, and a 28% lower risk of falls. Studies on physical function (not based on meta-analysis) reported similar inverse associations. The evidence certainty was moderate for all outcomes except for cardiovascular disease mortality (low), cancer incidence (low), physical function (low), and falls (very low).
pull down to refresh
related posts
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 13 Oct
I don't love that they used such different functional forms for each effect. It makes me think they're overfitting the data and putting too much weight on the specific features of the function they chose.
Maybe they explain these choices well in the paper, but it's a red flag to me.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 11 Oct
Did u post cuz we lowered posting fee??
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 11 Oct
I don't think so, but maybe. High posting costs do give me the impression territories have above normal or unique standards.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 11 Oct
In ~HealthAndFitness we want hard money to produce hard bodies
reply