pull down to refresh

I'm not so sure it's clear cut from a PR standpoint. You are "inside the beltway", like many of my friends. Often the mood of the country isn't easily read from there.
The idea of the rank and file drones of the bloated bureaucracy finally suffering a real layoff like the rest of us is powerful optics.
104 sats \ 4 replies \ @Cje95 OP 21h
Omg hearing that makes me feel disgusting.... excuse me as I go wash myself in bleach....
I think that my way of thinking about things like taking this and going okay what are the optics is one of the reasons I do not fit in in DC lol.
reply
I think siggy has a point here. I often hear things like, "Trump's actions have a real impact on people's livelihoods!" as a justification to anger. But they are just going through a common experience that most other people have to go through. Why do they feel like government work means you're entitled to absolute job stability? The Federal government supposedly exists to serve the people. It is not a jobs program for federal workers.
I understand why federal workers might be upset and they have every right to be. But if agency heads view their primary mission as protecting their subordinates' jobs, then the agencies will quickly devolve into bloated inefficient messes. (Which I think has already happened.)
reply
They need to identify as transgender contractors
Problem solved
Edit: If back pay is approved, make it a paper check so people have to come into the office
reply
92 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 21h
I think it might be helpful for anyone that isn't desiring to work for the Dark Lord of Mordor to view the "beltway" as Mordor.
reply
Bleach and HCQ
reply
All they're saying is that the backpay is not guaranteed automatically.
I'd say there's no chance of backpay actually being withheld because almost everyone in congress has a bunch of stuff they want the bureaucrats to do for them, which is why they always granted backpay before that law passed.
reply
The draft OMB memo reportedly argues that the 2019 law is not "self-executing" and that the payment would need to be specifically provided by Congress as part of the legislation to fund the government. The argument hinges on a technical reading, suggesting the law created an authorization to pay but not the actual appropriation.
reply
I saw somewhere that OMB hasn't even changed their FAQ, though, and it still says that all furloughed employees will receive backpay.
I think this was just a very feeble bluff.
reply
53 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 OP 18h
Oh I went on the site and it was def missing lol
reply