pull down to refresh
It's a little misleading to refer to the king's properties as private and the revenues weren't entirely untaxlike.
reply
pull down to refresh
It's a little misleading to refer to the king's properties as private and the revenues weren't entirely untaxlike.
I need to read this but I like to guess when I haven't.
The question is why? What was different?
For one thing. Kings! No illusion of democracy. No "We the People" are the government... so no we can't steal from ourselves.
Hoppe nails this in Democracy the God that Failed.