pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet 3 Oct \ parent \ on: Which Fork will you Sell and/or Keep? Bitcoin Knots vs Bitcoin Core bitcoin
I run the software that best suits my needs at the moment
Tell me one thing you need Knots for that isn't satisfied by an old version of Core, v27 for example.
At this moment, I also have a need to demonstrate my objections to Core's "roadmap"
You can virtue signal on the GitHub repo while running v27
To me, it is an issue of Governance over bitcoin. (which should not exist.)
Oh you'll love my other posts then
#1235102
write
preview
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @sudonaka 3 Oct
Tell me one thing you need Knots for that isn't satisfied by an old version of Core, v27 for example.
The client flag. Also, this is the default QT page for spam filtering in knots, the software makes it easy to refuse relaying inscriptions to other nodes pre-confirmation.
You can virtue signal on the GitHub repo while running v27
No I can't, because the Moderators banned "non technical" discussion. In addition, 20% alternative client use for the first time in bitcoin's history is more effective than "virtue-signalling" https://coin.dance/nodes
Archiving Core is one thing every Bitcoiner should agree upon.
I agree with that. Have a great day.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 OP 3 Oct
That is a lot of 'configuration' options...
How do you/we know that any of that 20% of nodes is real??? Those nodes don't pay fees. They don't compete for blockspace. They don't (necessarily) hold the keys to Bitcoin either.
What is the point of 'spooling up more nodes'... if it could be 1 node or 2 or 5 or 100 nodes per person? Are those nodes actually being used?
reply