pull down to refresh

My views align with this post. It’s always been very simple for me. If you pay the fee your transaction gets mined.
If bitcoin was congested and fees spiked and were elevated for a long time this wouldn’t be an issue at all.
But thanks to all the degen trading being nerfed by Wall Street the chain isn’t used as much as it used to be thus fees are always at or near the lower bound of 1 sat.
285 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 28 Sep
reply
246 sats \ 1 reply \ @sudonaka 28 Sep
I wonder if Calle will address why he pushed the fake story about a hard fork?
reply
Luke Dashjr is famous for having a very wide array of very-well-documented crazy opinions, where he wants the state to set rules and he will follow them blindly, and therefore it's very believable that he would advocate an OFAC-compliant hardfork. I agree that he's probably not actually seriously considering it, but he has lost credibility through he own arguments over decades.
  • banning monetary transaction that he doesn't like, such as gambling
  • women are the property of their husband
  • death penalty for adultery
  • everybody should follow all laws (even laws that ban Bitcoin)
  • monarchy is the best form of government
The evidence is here in this blog post: https://blog.lopp.net/knot-a-serious-project/ . You might distrust the author of that blog post, but he links to large amounts of hard evidence.
Luke is incredibly smart, and his engineering skills have helped Bitcoin a lot, and I hope he will continue to contribute and that we can thank him. But he must not be taken seriously as any sort of leader in Bitcoin
reply
10 sats \ 8 replies \ @000w2 28 Sep
The question is why do inscriptions spammers (for example) get a discount on fees relative to my monetary transaction data?
reply
Because Witness data gets a discount. And inscriptions disguise that arbitrary data as 'program script' basically fake scripts or pushdata (that's my understanding).
The 'witness limit' is 4mb meaning that individual transactions can be quite large. And a certain developer figured out a way to 'pretend' that certain sats were 'traceable'...
So you can 'pretend' that a certain sat corresponds to 'ownership' of certain arbitrary data and then 'sell it' as an nft or collectible etc. It's all so pointless because you can right-click on a jpeg.
reply
Let me reword. Why should they get a discount over my monetary transactions?
reply
Be practical. Are you advocating for a fork to remove the discount? A lot of people might be open to the idea, if you can get support for a credible plan, as any fork is obviously very difficult
reply
No, the damage has been done. I don't think the economics of the system should be messed with any more than they already have been.
Hopefully one day there will be some competing utreexo node I can run.
reply
Or how about just go out and use Bitcoin?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @000w2 14h
What makes you think I don't? Running a node is pretty pointless if you don't use bitcoin.
The reason I care so much is because my whole life depends on Bitcoin.
reply
Not you specifically. You're a Stacker. The collective 'you' as in everybody
My understanding is that the 'witness discount' was created to make the consolidation of UTXOs, and the batching of transactions cheaper.
Legacy addresses were cheaper to spend than to consolidate, meaning that people wouldn't spend/consolidate their change which would result in UTXO bloat over time.
Segwit (and Segwit addresses) made that cheaper (which was its intention) however a much-later byproduct was that arbitrary data, disguised as witness script, also got the same discount basically 75%.
#1 rule of engineering is that design decisions years later can have unintended effects.
reply