Yes, the ux is terrible. I'm only a backend engineer, I don't know how to build a beautiful GUI. But you know what's cool about building it the way I did? Reliability. If the buyer has a path to the seller, the contract is guaranteed to work. If he doesn't, the contract never happens. I decided to build something ugly and reliable and hire someone to fix the ui later if/when we get funding rather than build something pretty that only works sometimes. It's a trade-off but I'm confident that I made the right choice, because it's easier to make ugly software pretty than it is to make broken software work.

Thanks! Yes, the process is not very consumer friendly right now - what is important though is that it works. Once we launch, the UX and UI will be a lot more user friendly and allow the average person to use this with ease. We are still in beta and wanted to validate the idea before we further develop this.