For most of its history, Feeding America, the nation’s largest nonprofit, relied on a broken system to distribute its 220 million pounds of food per year. It ignored existing stocks and donations, flooding fully stocked food banks in Idaho with potatoes and warehouses in Alaska with five gallon buckets of pickles.
To fix how America fed its hungry would require the economics of market design. The new system increased food supply by 100 million pounds annually, equivalent to feeding an additional 60,000 people every day. It is one of the clearest successes of market design so far.
[1]
The Allocation of Food to Food Banks https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/11.1-Prendergast-food4-model.pdf ↩
Inspiring article. Free market principles in action.
Yeah, market design is a pretty cool area of study in game theory. It's all about looking at the nuts and bolts of how things actually get allocated, especially in systems where classical price discovery isn't as applicable.
Market design scholars designed more efficient algorithms for matching kidney donors to patients, for example, and Amazon hires people with that training to help work on their internal logistics.
The kidney donation system is flawed. Highest bidder moves to the front of the line. It’s immoral to pay for a kidney but perfectly acceptable to wait for a kidney when time is not on your side
Auctions, who would have guessed
https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/struggling-central-valley-residents-line-groceries-amid-californias-cost-living
The article from ZeroHedge details the struggle of Central Valley residents in California coping with the state's high cost of living, which has led to high rates of food insecurity. Key points from the article: