pull down to refresh
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @Arceris 15h \ parent \ on: What do you think about section 230? Politics_And_Law
I linked to that site because it was the first that I found with that quote from Lummis. There are others. But the rest of that article is crap.
Regarding the Bondi situation, she did cite one statute, then proceeded to totally misconstrue it. But whatever, I'm willing to agree that that's a one off and related to being improperly prepared for that stand up. She has walked it back. But in other contexts she has supported red flag laws & other significant 2A restrictions, so my sense is that her gut instinct was her real feelings, and the walking it back is contrived.
The above link, btw, is to FIRE, where I was a 1A and 4A civil liberties attorney for a time (about 10 years ago now).
Much better article, and Bondi doesn't have a lot of fans already within MAGA, given the lack of arrests... Wouldn't surprise me if she's been set up to fail so they can bring Gaetz back in to the conversation.
I don't think you'll need to come out of retirement anytime soon. That article makes me even more confident that "stochastic terrorism" type stuff will be tested, but not as confident that they'll use every avenue to go for the head of the snake funding the psyops making regular people talk like that.
reply