pull down to refresh
102 sats \ 16 replies \ @jbschirtzinger 12h \ on: DISCUSS: "If you ever made a sat from spam, you are a bad actor" bitcoin
The thing about money is that people value all manner of things with it. I might say if you have ever paid a stripper, your opinion about money is irrelevant, since you are using it for stupid reasons.
On the other hand, if someone who PAID a stripper wants to send you 1 Bitcoin, where are your ethics in that situation?
Paying a stripper is a monetary transaction. Using a dollar as you cum rag and slipping it between her breasts is a non-monetary transaction.
reply
not a relevant argument? she can still spend the dollar, no matter how you use it.
reply
Dodges the question is the problem. What if someone does that with a million dollar bill. You gonna take it?
reply
probably. I can do a lot of washing for a million dollars.
reply
But you can never wash away what you had to accept.
reply
This makes no sense.
reply
I'm saying you can't wash away the memory that you took a million dollars that had a wad of cum dripping off the edges of it--you know--to put it indelicately.
reply
so...the analogy is that we can't wash away the memory that there is spam in transactions included in the bitcoin blockchain?
okay: the conversation isn't about what one does in order to receive the payment, but about what is on the payment itself, the nature of the specie.
I might agree that there are things I won't do for a million dollars.
But if I found a million dollars -- even in the state you so well describe -- I would be very willing to do quite a lot of cleaning.
Like spam, it's not black and white, not deterministic. If a bunch of people have to pass the million dollar to me they might take a bit more time, so I would rather it not be full of cum.
reply
Whether you take the million dollars is deterministic and black and white. That's the point.
reply
Bingo.
reply