> I’m asking you specifically about the chain code labs employees.

No you didn't. Read your own comment: https://stacker.news/items/1227300/r/optimism?commentId=1227740.

> They all are paid by the same company, they work from the same office.

Naw bruh. If you would have clicked the link I gave you (I even put it on blame so you could straight move on to the commit authors for each key and not have to lookup pgp keys) and done some research you would have known the % of maintainers that work for chaincode. Takes... 20 minutes if you manually verify everything like a real Chad. 

The problem isn't the funding, and you would know that if you would just do your research. Don't take my word for it! Go check it out yourself! Reach your own conclusions! Be a king in the age of retardation!

> You have zero concerns about that?

I have serious concerns about the echo chamber I'm perceiving; probably more serious than you can ever imagine. And because of that, and because we know we cannot tell people what to do, I agreed with you [above](https://stacker.news/items/1227133/r/optimism?commentId=1227356) that it would be good to have a third fork. So who are you arguing with?

I’m asking you specifically about the chain code labs employees. 

They all are paid by the same company, they work from the same office. 

You have zero concerns about that? 

sudonaka

 is where you can see maintainers of Core.

bitcoin

Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

0xbitcoiner

[Here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blame/master/contrib/verify-commits/trusted-keys) is where you can see maintainers of Core.