> the minority scenario?

You mean it's not _actually_ inhibiting adoption as it sits? 

That's my point, the "solution" is to a problem that hasn't manifested and there's no indication it ever will.

justin_shocknet

It doesn't "scale" anything, the upper bound for Lightning channels is how many users can afford to unilaterally enforce claims with the chain, and that's purely a function of supply of Bitcoin

why would this be the upper bound when this is (by far) the minority scenario? unilateral exit is important to be able to exercise, but seems weird to assess the ability to exercise this in an extreme scenario that will never happen.

bitcoin

Ark & Spark: The Channel Factories We've Been Waiting For ⚡️

> It doesn't "scale" anything, the upper bound for Lightning channels is how many users can afford to unilaterally enforce claims with the chain, and that's purely a function of supply of Bitcoin

why would this be the upper bound when this is (by far) the minority scenario? unilateral exit is important to be able to exercise, but seems weird to assess the ability to exercise this in an extreme scenario that will never happen.