pull down to refresh

There seems to be a bit of a disconnect between the cheering around technical achievements and the economic reality that surrounds it, yes.
But if I look at both the comments and the article, then there's also a disconnect there: if you want quick block reconstruction by already knowing all the txs in the block beforehand, then it is useful to know... all the txs that are mined in the block, beforehand.
This is why not tracking transactions that you could know of is self-defeating. Whereas not mining transactions you consider undesired, is only unwise from a profit-maximalist perspective.
Technically, you can create any rules you desire for inclusion in your block templates without unnecessarily limiting your mempool's contents. All it takes is taking a step back and realize that you can be spam hating and censorship hating at the same time. This is the challenge to all that seem to be polarizing themselves over something as retarded as BRC-20.
The core dev team is too centralized
Paychecks from same company
Work in same office
We need knots and a third major client implementation too
reply
42 sats \ 7 replies \ @optimism 1h
Yes, it would be good to have a great, conservative implementation. Maybe libbitcoin can be that, maybe another fork of Core...
but that has literally nothing to do with what I just said.
reply
100 sats \ 6 replies \ @kepford 1h
You know what else! Water is wet! That's important too!
reply
66 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 1h
Well yes but that's annoying, especially when it rains and you just wanted to read the newspaper on a bench in the park.
So maybe, we can filter out the wetness from the water and make it dry. That would be much better.
reply
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @kepford 1h
If we don't filter out wetness I say rain is dead. Its game over. Wrap it up boys
reply
43 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 1h
Thinking of it, yes. I'm convinced that this is urgent and if we do nothing right away then before you know it people will abuse this wetness to flood homes.
#hardforkphysics
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @kepford 53m
Dude, I already have a fix for this. Join my alternate dimension where we pretend that we should try to fix physics and ignore umbels and roofs.
reply
60 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 50m
Oh! Thank you kindly. Migrating now!