pull down to refresh

20 sats \ 6 replies \ @LibreHans OP 15h \ parent \ on: Chris Guida debunks the core narrative bitcoin
You're misunderstanding the argument, Chris is not talking about current block space but about incentives and markets. What he actually argued: demand is unbounded, a point made by gmaxwell in 2015 or so. E.g., anybody on the planet who needs to store data forever can now do it more easily in bitcoin.
write
preview
223 sats \ 5 replies \ @kruw 15h
demand is unbounded
That's why we fought a block size war in 2017 to limit supply.
reply
182 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 12h
That's why we fought a block size war in 2017 to limit supply.
Well....the result of SegWit actually increased the limit by 4x during that time. However the popular narrative tends to ignore that. I often wonder if miners today (with extremely low fees) have benefited or been harmed by that....hard to know....
but filters don't work
That argument is actually immaterial to the larger point. Such a concession to data-storage in core is a signal that developers agree with that use case.
What you incentivize you will get more of....
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @LibreHans OP 15h
The limit doesn't ensure the space is used for electronic cash
reply
121 sats \ 2 replies \ @kruw 15h
Correct. If you want to ensure the space if used in a certain way, then you can enforce that with your node and fork the blockchain.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @LibreHans OP 15h
Ah, so you're in the filters don't work camp, when the evidence show they do, like Chris explained
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kruw 15h
Filters don't work, here's proof:
reply