pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @BitcoinMotorist 16 Sep \ on: OP_RETURN consensus limit bitcoin
This is one of the best explainers of what OP_RETURN is and how it came about. It was always limited by filters and the filters are effective even though they are sometimes bypassed. https://blog.bitmex.com/dapps-or-only-bitcoin-transactions-the-2014-debate/
write
preview
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @BallLightning OP 16 Sep
Well, that's a good post, but unfortunately it's off-topic since it doesn't answer or try to answer the question in the original post.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @BitcoinMotorist 16 Sep
Because your question is built on a false premise. OP_RETURN was specifically introduced because it is within consensus. The only way to limit it was with policy rules. The policy rules are effective. Why do a consensus change when one isn't needed?
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @BallLightning OP 16 Sep
It is not built on false premise. I am asking why isn't the limit INSIDE consensus rules. This is the WHOLE point of this question, nothing more.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinMotorist 16 Sep
Because it's not a consensus issue
reply