pull down to refresh

This is a fantastic article explaining my America is a superpower and possibly can remain in this position over the next century.

In Summary

The US has:
  • Some of the best farmland in the world
  • The best naturally navigable waterways in the world
  • Amazing natural ports
  • All of these connect US regions to each other, uniting them politically
  • It also has some of the best oil and gas resources to fuel its economy
  • And it has several layers of defense to protect all this wealth, starting with the two largest oceans, one on each side
  • After the oceans, it has two insurmountable mountain barriers that further defend its heartland Its neighbor to the north is sparsely populated because it's too cold and infertile
  • Its neighbor to the south is weaker and separated by a narrow mountainous desert
Bookmark this for all the China bulls out there and all the Doom and gloomers about America.
The US has:
  • Europeans as allies 🤠
  • The power to go Brrrrr (Or is this the Achilles’ heel?)
reply
The power to go Brrrrr is basically America's double edged sword..... it is both its greatest strength and greatest weakness.
reply
Europe is an USA colony not an ally.
reply
What the heck did you take today? LSD? ahahah
reply
How many US military bases does Germany have?
reply
NATO bases?
reply
reply
So that's what a colony means to you? Hahaha!
reply
well a country with foreign military bases from another looks like a colony to me. Or are americans just exporting democracy there as usual?
Largely the premise of "The accidental super power" by Peter Zeihan
True but also backwards looking, technological asymmetry closes the gap, space is the next war fighting domain for example...
Zeihan also talks about the culture that is unique to Americans, in some part because of our geographic advantages... We won't tolerate anything less than greatness and manifest destiny, whereas your average europoor or arduous marching Chinese see struggle as virtue
reply
Let's not forget also what the founding fathers said about how great democracy is:
"God forbid that we should ever be so miserable as to sink into a Republic.” 6 One of the Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton, perhaps the most gifted of them all, regretted that the United States could not become a monarchy. Van Buren saw in Hamilton a monarchist, 7 certainly a conviction well grounded in facts 8 in view of Hamilton’s speeches at the Federal Convention in 1787 and 1788 in New York. And Francis Lieber very rightly pointed out that the Declaration of Independence is not really an antimonarchical document. 9 The sentence, “A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people” merely condemns George III but, at the same time, voices great respect for the royal office. The average American today would be surprised to hear the term “ruler of a free people” in which he sees a contradictio in adjecto. But in formulations like these we perceive a few aspects of Jefferson’s highly contradictory character and mind. He does stand near the mainstream of American leftist thought and deserved Hamilton’s severe strictures. 10 But then he was also the man who, in a letter to Mann Page, spoke about the “swinish multitudes.” 11 And Gouverneur Morris, on the extreme right, wrote to Nathanael Green in 1781, “I will go farther, I have no hope that our Union can subsist except in the form of an absolute monarchy.”
Of the American founders, Alexander Hamil- ton was a monarchist. Likewise, the Governor of Pennsylvania, Robert Morris, had strong monarchist leanings. George Washington expressed his profound distaste of democracy in a letter of September 30,1798, to James McHenry. John Adams was convinced that every society grows aristocrats as inevitably as a field of corn will grow some large ears and some small. In a letter to John Taylor he insisted, like Plato and Aristotle, that democracy would ultimately evolve into despotism, and in a letter to Jefferson he declared that "democracy will envy all, contend with all, en- deavor to pull down all, and when by chance it happens to get the upper hand for a short time, it will be revengeful, bloody and cruel." James Madison, in a letter to Jared Parks, complained of the difficulty "of protecting the rights of property against the spirit of democracy." And even Thomas Jefferson, probably the most "democratic" of the Founders, confessed in a letter to John Adams that he consid- ered the natural aristocracy .. . as the most precious gift of nature, for the instruction, the trusts and governments of society. And indeed, it would have been inconsistent in creation to have formed men for the social state, and not have provided virtue and wisdom enough to manage the concerns of society. May we not even say that that form of government is best, which provides most effectually for a pure selection of these natural aristoi into the offices of government? Characterizing the general attitude of the founders, then, the most appropriate pro- nouncement is that of John Randolph of Roanoke: "I am an aristocrat: I love liberty, I hate equality."
reply
reply
Right, debt and production does not matter at all.
reply