pull down to refresh

81 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 10h \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
in a private group chat?
write
preview
55 sats \ 8 replies \ @BlokchainB 10h
Yeah or just peer to peer
reply
51 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 10h
p2p might make sense if it's the first time and you can then remove the fee
but it sounds dumb to keep paying each other for no apparent reason
is it non-custodial? if so, there are also network fees involved, right?
reply
50 sats \ 3 replies \ @BlokchainB 10h
It uses ecash and a nostr relay to send messages
reply
67 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 10h
From their Github:
this looks like you are not paying each other, but the relay
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 10h
Thus you can’t turn it off I assume
reply
86 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 10h
of course
reply
75 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker 10h
What if you view it as a fee for service? To support the app developer instead of ads or selling data for example
reply
46 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 10h
Mhhh, didn't think about that, thanks
But I imagine the UX is terrible, so I might actually prefer watching ads instead, it might have better UX, lol.
Pay-per-message also punishes you if you're the type that sends multiple smaller messages instead of one bigger one. Or you just keep editing old messages if possible, for as long as possible. Or do edits also have a fee?
See? I'm already trying to optimize the fee, instead of having a great experience.
However, I did not try it out, so maybe it doesn't actually work that way.
reply
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 10h
Depends on how good the rest of the app experience is I suppose. For example, I think people who like SN are the ones least likely to try and optimize their zap earnings (at least, not in a hyper calculated way). And the causality probably runs both ways
reply