pull down to refresh
I'm not surprised you don't understand the problem, after all you're a long time bitcoiner and can maintain as many nodes as you like, and spend an unlimited amount of sats for hardware upgrades, and you can't related to people in emerging markets who dream of running a node one day.
so my meme is true: if I do not run Knots I am killing people in "emergent markets" now LOL
“More babies are dying in countries around the world because they have less economic freedom”
https://odysee.com/@HardcoreCrypto:f/babies-are-dying-because-of-bitcoin:c
(Not my video, just found through search).
Wow, how things never change. Knots drama is Bcash all over again.
Cute, so you pretend I said something I didn't say to make a point, maybe because you have no point LOL
I'm impressed, you can use MS paint, that's adorable. You must be a knots user impersonating a coretard who can't make a coherent argument to make them look bad LOL
In fact I run btcd + neutrino and I don't care about those two you mentioned hahahahaha
Why would I want to maintain more than one node?
Last I checked, my 8-year-old laptop is still keeping up with the chaintip.
Hurr durr my 8 year old computer is good enough to sync the spam chain. Just stop being poor fuckface.
Surprised to see you tricked here Darth.
Every node currently defaults to filters. The change is upcoming in Core v30.
To be clear, Bitcoin Core v30 lets node runners configure the OP_RETURN size limit (the -datacarriersize config option). The only change is that its default value is increased (to effectively unlimited). It is marked deprecated, which means the option is expected to be removed in a future version, but given the current political dispute around it, I do not expect that will happen any time soon.
Well at least we can always:
deleted by author
Indeed, lots of stupidity, like the idiots who pretend that anybody says that filters solve all problems.