pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @79c9095526 12 Sep \ parent \ on: Debunking the Slander on Charlie Kirk: what he *Actually* said on Gun Deaths Politics_And_Law
Reread your first sentence, it doesn't make sense. Perhaps you just mistyped a word or two?
You're right, its hard to believe "official narratives" after the FBI yesterday leaked that the shooter has a trans ideology based on writings on the bullets. Now what was their 'proof' of this? The following images. When the decision was clearly made ahead of time to blame this on a particular group to fit the narrative the people in power prefer, you have to take all of this with a fuck-ton of salt.
How could this narrative be fabricated in any way when you're seeing in real time that the entirety of the left and the mainstream media are celebrating and vindicating this, saying, textually: that "he had it coming" and "he would have justified this murder as necessary". Let alone to official and the unofficial, this is right in front of you. All of this people are expressing explicitly that if you do not share their views you should be executed.