pull down to refresh

conscription is a difficult issue. most officers with whom I discussed it emphasized that they'd prefer soldiers who served voluntarily, or at least, willingly, rather than unmotivated conscripts; and that this opinion went quite high, although at the statistical level, the government kept conscription simply due to the need for enough manpower.
Then the reason is basically to have a nation called Israel that has boundaries from people that wish it harm. Again, I think this is a credit, although one can argue about what constitutes harm.
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @adlai OP 10h
Then the reason is basically to have a nation [...]
We're getting a little off-topic for this thread about my github account!
I do however wish to emphasize that the observations about conscription are universal, i.e. similar opinions could probably be found from officers in any conscription military. To a certain degree, I served in the IDF simply due to legal inertia; around the age of sixteen I began making inquiries about the various ways people had either evaded the service requirement, or accepted it and made the most of the experience, and my conclusion after about a year of gathering and forming opinions was that although I could have mounted an effective case as a conscientious objector, it would actually not have been an honest one. This was a difficult realisation for a geeky teenager who had all sorts of grandiose ideas, including thinking of himself as a pacifist. I realised that I was not as much of a pacifist as I had naively imagined. The grandiose ideas did survive, although mostly just as sad dreams for a better world that might only be attainable for future generations.
reply
I have some things I'd say about this, but maybe this isn't the spot. If you start a thread about this elsewhere though, I will.
reply