My understanding from various gossip is that the only defensible tightening of arms control legislations that could get argued into various branches of the Uncle is about beginning to consider rifles[1] similarly dangerous to, I dunno, what has the typically medialiterate American heard of these days? Ricin?
Hunting rifles for long-distance single-ball targeting, as opposed to sidearms. ↩
My understanding from various gossip is that the only defensible tightening of arms control legislations that could get argued into various branches of the Uncle is about beginning to consider rifles[1] similarly dangerous to, I dunno, what has the typically medialiterate American heard of these days? Ricin?
Hunting rifles for long-distance single-ball targeting, as opposed to sidearms. ↩