pull down to refresh
61 sats \ 4 replies \ @Scoresby 22h \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
The other judges and I debated whether to do the prizes out of band or via zaps on SN.
Out of band wouldn't have had the 30% Sybil fee, but it also wouldn't have shown up in the competition rankings. And it would have been a little messy. Zaps were clean and everybody in the community could see that we did them.
I suppose we could have zapped each of the top ten 14285 sats (which nets to 10k sats) but we didn't think of that in our budget.
I'd be curious to hear your thoughts about how to approach this in future contests.
Since a lot of people don’t know about the Sybil fee, I think it’d be more transparent to just show the actual prize people are gonna get, or at least make it clear there’s a 30% Sybil fee.
reply
I think it's the most logical thing...!!!
I think the same thing happened to @GreaterthanFiction as to the winner of the MrBeast Games.
reply
Thanks for clarifying. I didn’t realise there was a fee but makes sense to keep the platform running. I think mentioning it in the competition terms would suffice. Appreciate the zaps as know these runner up sats weren’t expected either.
reply