pull down to refresh

33 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 10 Sep \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
the intention behind the sybil fee is to hurt, especially for big zaps since we don’t know if you’re zapping yourself.
-- #748657
this also means that two stackers that have equal trust have less impact together than individually. If one of them zaps 10k is more signal in this system than if both zap 5k. I think that’s the opposite of what we want unfortunately and sounds like a game breaker to this idea.
-- #748836
write
preview
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10 Sep
Good summary! I wasn’t trying to bring that whole discussion back, I just wanted to show that Google put a result for SN in second place. Kinda makes you wonder why Google did that?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 10 Sep
ouh, wow, that's crazy, thanks
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Scoresby 10 Sep
It's the fourth result for me when googling "Sybil fee" -- but still really cool.
reply
102 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 23h
For me it's 12th result -- on page 2.
First result was obituary for one Sybil Lorraine Fee. Others were more general information about sybil attacks, sybil resistance, and then a company called sybil-something.
Interestingly, SN is the first result that uses sybil fee in the context of fees for the purpose of building sybil resistance.
Did SN coin the term sybil fee?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 22h
Sybil Lorraine Fee
This lady's name is too good. I'm definitely going to look into this.
reply