pull down to refresh

If this is a concern you should put in your terms that the sats on stacker.news are just points that are redeemable for sats, that way the user would only need to report on withdrawals
Does anyone else do that? Can I do that if we call them sats everywhere?
reply
That's what we do at TBC
reply
have you asked a lawyer about this? :thinking:
not a lawyer but if the points are transferrable and redeemable for money this is effectively money and most likely courts will say calling them "points" doesn't get around the fact of the matter.
reply
this is what our lawyers told us to do
reply
And there is another question: would renaming them from "sats" to "points" be necessary? Afterall, that would be an after-the-fact thing. I would guess the answer depends on what the SN ToS currently says about the nature of the sats-on-SN vs sats-on-Lightning.
reply
There is no ToS lol.
reply
There is one and only one for IRS/govs: GFY šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚
reply
very good point.
reply