pull down to refresh

Just a couple of weeks ago it was reported that the Iranians had started to worry about the possibility that Britain and the rest of the EU would trigger snapback sanctions due to Iran refusing to go to the negotiation table.
The warning has prompted urgent internal discussions in Tehran. “The Islamic Republic does not have the financial or military capacity to endure the snapback of UN sanctions. It would make the people protest again and this time it might be different,” a senior Iranian official told The Telegraph from Tehran.
“They are more damaging than war,” a senior Iranian official said. “The supreme national security council has asked the presidential office to find a way for talks before it is too late.”
Instead of it just being rumored that there was a split in the country it has become public.
The split became public when a senior Revolutionary Guard official criticized President Masoud Pezeshkian’s statements defending negotiations. Aziz Ghazanfari, deputy political chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said Mr. Pezeshkian’s “verbal mistakes have increased” since taking office.
Mr. Pezeshkian had asked critics: “If you don’t talk, what will you do? Do you want to fight? Well, they hit us, we rebuild, and they’ll hit us again.
Compared to 10 years ago Iran faces a much much more difficult situation even with just rebuilding after the brief war and attacks. Russia was by far the most significant partner for Iran as there civilian nuclear program was built in partnership with Russia and the majority of air defenses and other major things came via there partnership. China has also been a huge partner but China already accounts for the vast majority of Irans oil exports and they are also stuck in trade issues with the US and still with the EU.
The price of materials have done nothing but increase and the price of oil has fallen further compounding rebuilding issues. Right now as it stands Europe serves as Iran's life line but that is crumbling. When you add in critical things like power outages across the nation as well as the country running out of water the situation for Iran's leadership is becoming very very dangerous. Yesterday we learned that Iran INCREASED its nuclear weapons grade uranium stockpile before the US struck them destroying or damaging main facilities across the country.
The clocks ticking for Iran to get itself together and choose peace.
Choose peace is perhaps something for the biggest most aggressive military in the world to consider. Just a thought
reply
We haven't gotten in any wars and frankly have ended several bubbling issues that seem like they were pretty close to exploding.
Also funding proxies that not only are attacking allies but also international shipping is going to have consequences.
reply
When you’re the only military that’s been in perpetual conflict all over the world for almost a century, look in the mirror instead of pointing fingers.
reply
Ehhhh a lot of European countries have been involved in all of these as well the UK and the French.
Russia has been in conflict constantly as well even creating their own wars independent of ours. Also Columbia had what a 45 year civil war so 🤷🏼‍♂️ factor in Sudan as well I mean militaries are always fighting and have been.
Wasn't it UK and France that had the 150-year war?
reply
None of them have been in perpetual conflict on the other side of the planet. Can you really not see the distinction here?
reply
Wait wait wait you don't think France has been?! Not only with their former territories in Africa but also in Asia. The Vietnam wars roots go back to Franch and their fight from 1946-1954?!? In 1950 France even asked for our help in Vietnam???
I mean look at France and New Caledonia right now lol
reply
  1. Saying some other bad actor is doing it too is not a good argument.
  2. The scope and consistency of global conflict is not even remotely comparable between France and America.
I don’t think it’s accurate to say that France has been engaged in a military conflict far from its own territory consistently for over 80 years. I’m open to being wrong about that particular point but it doesn’t change the broader point about the US government being a unique global belligerent.
reply