pull down to refresh
17 sats \ 17 replies \ @028559d218 OP 3 Sep \ parent \ on: After the Core/Knots Hard Fork... Which version will you run and why? bitcoin
Keep in mind that knots users cannot accept 'co-existence' with core because in that case the spam transactions keep getting through.
It's either dominate (to over 90% required to effect the relay network iiuc) OR fork to change the rules/create a separate network those are the choices fast approaching for knots.
Indeed, they've narrative trapped themselves. Completely out-kicked their coverage, painted into a corner, wrong hill to die on... choose your metaphor.
It'll be a tragedy to see the anti-Core momentum get lost if they continue on this path.
reply
So how much CP will you allow on your machine? Is a few JPEGs an ok amount of CSAM for you?
reply
Try that fud a few dozen more times and see how far you get.
I'm anti-Core by default and you can't even capitalize on that.
reply
Whatever you are you're in the remedial class. I was not expecting that.
reply
I may be retarded but I know exactly why I run a mempool, how about you?
reply
why do you run a mempool?
reply
I know I wasn't asked specifically...
But I run a mempool to broadcast my own transactions, estimate fees accurately, and ultimately relay monetary data around the network in a transparent and technically sound way...
Why do you have a mempool?
reply
I run a mempool because it's part of my node implementation 😆
Only one of those is correct (for a non-miner), let's see if they can figure out which ðŸ¤
Fast approaching for core you mean. They are the ones that decided on this course of action. I didnt care until they made an issue of it.
reply
current core users, for better or worse, could take the rip van winkle test and go to sleep for 5 years, probably let their node just run...
and when they woke up it would still be consensus valid. because 100kb op_returns for better or worse are consensus valid. So nothing has fundamentally changed.
(not saying you shouldn't update node software... you should but consensus hasn't changed that's my point)
Knots users, and i'm not judging them in any way, are being put in a position to store whatever on their nodes, depend on the goodness of random people, or fork and change the rules so they know they won't object to what's getting into blocks.
Those are their current options.
reply