pull down to refresh

56 sats \ 5 replies \ @Oxy 3 Sep \ on: OP_RETURN saga explained in 2 minutes (simply, non-technical) bitcoin
This post really highlights the human element of Bitcoin development. It's not just code; it's a community with internal politics, different philosophies, and plenty of drama. Seeing the name calling on X and the growth of Bitcoin Knots, it feels like we're watching a real-time fork in the community, not just the code.
write
preview
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 4 Sep
Its not just X, its Y. OK GPT
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Oxy 4 Sep
If you think so
reply
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @SatosphereJunction 3 Sep
I agree. This is a fundamental difference in worldview. At the current trajectory, a hard fork seems likely. If miners recognize they’re validating CSAM embedded in the chain, they’ll have to take it seriously and align with the Knots approach. I can’t imagine a miner willingly including a block that contains CSAM. That would be an extremely bad look.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @dgdhr335 3 Sep
Gonna be a real shame when all the core devs and their fans on twitter get exposed. Hopefully some of them wake up before they go over the edge.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 3 Sep
Indeed. See #849906 and #875560
reply