Is it possible NOT to find a route for a payment invoice to a node that’s running and with one channel open?
Same question but maybe better explained: My node X is connected to node Y (which is connected to many others). Is it possible not finding a route to get a payment from Z?
Should I then Open a Channel directly with Z? Would that make my node the connection between Y and Z? Will I route transactions between Y and Z if I left that two channels opened?
Path finding in a payment depends on many aspects:
So yes, in general a payment could not find a correct route. Try again later or increase the fees.
Oh, must be Tor connection and low fees. Will try later with increased fees to see if that’s the problem and then open a channel anyway with Z for future transactions. Thx!
deleted by author
Your explanations are so didactical and well done. If you could take just half the time with the poor, confused shitcoiners and show them the the force, instead insulting them with capital letters, we will have a better world.
deleted by author
deleted by author
Generally speaking, it makes sense to open a channel to nodes you plan to do business with. Routing's bests use case is for transacting with nodes you didn't plan to do business with and especially if you don't plan to continue to do business with that node.
The model is a little different when you're using an LSP though.
Thx
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author