pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @optimism 1 Sep \ parent \ on: OpenAI employees review your chats and may refer to law enforcement AI
Maybe use ppq.ai (low volume) or venice.ai (higher volume) instead?
write
preview
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @Scoresby OP 1 Sep
I used to use Venice (free version) but I found the results weren't as good as Gemini or Chat. But I probably should have given the paid Venice version a chance before going to paid version of one of the popular llms.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 1 Sep
It used to be that you could pay for venice pro with sats - not sure if that's still the case.
ppq makes you pay per query and is anon and incentivizes LN, so you can basically use gpt-5 there anon, paying per query.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @000w2 1 Sep
There's Maple
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @Signal312 2 Sep
When you say ppq.ai (low volume) do you mean you should only use a small volume of queries? And is that so that the source LLM can't aggregate?
If so, how does venice.ai not have the same issue?
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 2 Sep
Good question.
Venice is an inference provider, so they run open source models for you. Chat is a monthly/annual subscription. Their API is pay-per-token and involves tons of shitcoinery.
PPQ is a router and token reseller where you pay per token on both chat and API. If have a low volume of tokens (i.e. you don't use it much) this can be, despite their price markup, cheaper than paying for a subscription. If however you use it a lot, it won't be cost-effective.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Signal312 2 Sep
Ah, I see, so you're not talking about privacy here, just cost.
One of the reasons I like ppq.ai is that you can switch easily between LLMs.
reply
34 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 2 Sep
Yes, privacy is a procedure - neither does KYC of any kind so it's easy to be anon on there.
I don't mind ppq, works as advertised. It's expensive though; there's room for competition there.
reply