pull down to refresh

10 sats \ 3 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 9 Jan 2023 \ parent \ on: Is LND (Lightning Labs) ruining the Lighting Network? bitcoin
Yes, you go ahead and shit other people's hard work. That's really nice of you. I'm sure you're a super developer.
You call it a success story, it's not. Sorry that hit a touch spot for you.
The point was to show that lnd is indeed collaborating with the rest.
Perhaps you've never tried to open a zero conf channel with LND to another implementation. Or perhaps you've never tried to accept a zero conf channel with LND from another implementation. Maybe you should try it before calling it a success story. Sure, they collaborate, but this is a terrible example.
write
preview
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @hampus 9 Jan 2023
You call it a success story, it's not. Sorry that hit a touch spot for you.
Yes, it's a success story if you stick to the topic, which is node implementation collaboration.
Perhaps you've never tried to open a zero conf channel with LND to another implementation. Or perhaps you've never tried to accept a zero conf channel with LND from another implementation. Maybe you should try it before calling it a success story. Sure, they collaborate, but this is a terrible example.
Stick to the topic.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TonyGiorgio 9 Jan 2023
They collaborated and failed, okay great example. Thanks for the conversations and confirmation.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @hampus 9 Jan 2023
Bruh. What is your problem? It's one example of a collaboration out of many. It was meant to show that it's just pure FUD that lnd isn't involved in the BOLT process.
And it's not a failed collaboration. Issues are actively being addressed.
reply