pull down to refresh

I think that what Luke argues is that a miner including all these shitty txs is comparable.
That’s charitable of you, but Luke literally claims that -datacarrier has always referred to all forms of embedding data, when that is in direct contradiction to the discussion around and documentation of the introduction of -datacarrier. He even unilaterally filed a CVE for that. As far as I am aware, no other Bitcoin Core contributor shares this interpretation.
152 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 18h
I don't agree with that claim or the CVE either. I'm not a Luke apologist and instead am of the blunt opinion that all the endless whining and "you lie" and CVE filing is what you'd expect from an 8yo. I am also fully of the opinion that it's a non-issue because he literally has filters in his fork, so there is nothing to discuss anymore. But apparently this behavior works on a subset of people susceptible to drama, like a cult... idk.
I don't mean to speak to Luke's actions being right (or even his take on the problem at hand) but instead I'm trying to illustrate how this view evolves in people and where even a slightly different interpretation of what acceptable use is, and what the role of a developer is in steering these norms, can lead to a completely different view.
TLDR; I don't agree with Luke's view and I think he behaves like a child but as an outside observer I can at least respect the sentiment, while not sharing it.
reply