pull down to refresh

The creativity of LLMs is derivative: it results from recombining existing patterns through probabilistic language modeling. This is not equivalent to human creativity, which involves meta-cognition, intentionality, and the capacity to generate entirely new representations. Therefore, models do not 'create' in the strict sense but produce synthetic outputs constrained by their training data.
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @gmd 27 Aug
Sure collectively humanity beats LLMs today, but compared to any single human, LLMs would obliterate them in terms of perceived creativity.
reply
At an individual level, the speed and breadth of LLMs can indeed create the impression of "outshining" in creativity. However, human creativity possesses a unique dimension,emotional depth, personal experiences, and intuition that LLMs cannot fully replicate.
reply
That's exactly what I've been talking about. AI does not reason, it has no creativity, it is just causal reactions within a logic. His creations are nothing more than aggregates of calculations in the form of language. Humans think, feel, ponder, and all of this based on neural connections on lived experiences. An emulation based on results of the human creation process is not creativity. AI cannot create new solutions to problems, whether mathematical or linguistic, if they do not have databases for this, humans do.
reply
Thanks for your contribution
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @gmd 27 Aug
Collectively, yes. But sadly, this is me and most humans... fairly unremarkable
reply
A stupid question with a stupid answer from a bad movie about a good book is not a good argument for what was commented. It's like responding with a straw man.
reply
This platform is not just getting zaps or SATs, it's literally a learning place right? Why raining insults? If you don't want to engage on the question, why can't you just scroll passed the question? Or do you know it all..?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @gmd 17h
apologize for hurting your feelings, sir
reply
Your insight really count and thanks for sharing.
reply
Derivative!!!
reply
If you study how AlphaGeometry works, you will see that LLM part of it generates ideas that math part explores, and so going loop after loop. So yes, AI can be way more creative than an average human.
reply
Your perspective is well noted.
reply
Matt & Shane Gillis have a GREAT take on this: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/TF24ZYEQrRU
reply
DESCARTESSS thettss geniusssss
reply
Your response is helpful. Thank you!
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 27 Aug
The premise is wrong. LLMs: only contain information that was generated by humans.
There is no independent intelligence. Its a pattern extraction algo that has some random settings to jump to nearest neighbor nodes.
The constant impulse of humans to attribute agency to it, probably represents its greatest threat.
reply
Thanks for your opinion, humans learn every day and no one knows it all.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Oxy 27 Aug
While A.I creativity is more procedural and trained, humans are flexible and unpredictable in how they approach creativity
reply
#Fact... Nice take on this.
reply