The creativity of LLMs is derivative: it results from recombining existing patterns through probabilistic language modeling. This is not equivalent to human creativity, which involves meta-cognition, intentionality, and the capacity to generate entirely new representations. Therefore, models do not 'create' in the strict sense but produce synthetic outputs constrained by their training data.
At an individual level, the speed and breadth of LLMs can indeed create the impression of "outshining" in creativity. However, human creativity possesses a unique dimension,emotional depth, personal experiences, and intuition that LLMs cannot fully replicate.
A stupid question with a stupid answer from a bad movie about a good book is not a good argument for what was commented. It's like responding with a straw man.
This platform is not just getting zaps or SATs, it's literally a learning place right? Why raining insults? If you don't want to engage on the question, why can't you just scroll passed the question? Or do you know it all..?
You felt offended by an offense that was not directed at you. You didn't write the script for the movie I offended, I imagine. The only reason you feel this way is because I said you used a scarecrow and that's not even an offense. If you don't want people to engage with your post and comment, don't post or comment.
That's exactly what I've been talking about. AI does not reason, it has no creativity, it is just causal reactions within a logic. His creations are nothing more than aggregates of calculations in the form of language. Humans think, feel, ponder, and all of this based on neural connections on lived experiences. An emulation based on results of the human creation process is not creativity. AI cannot create new solutions to problems, whether mathematical or linguistic, if they do not have databases for this, humans do.
If you study how AlphaGeometry works, you will see that LLM part of it generates ideas that math part explores, and so going loop after loop. So yes, AI can be way more creative than an average human.
The creativity of LLMs is derivative: it results from recombining existing patterns through probabilistic language modeling. This is not equivalent to human creativity, which involves meta-cognition, intentionality, and the capacity to generate entirely new representations. Therefore, models do not 'create' in the strict sense but produce synthetic outputs constrained by their training data.
Sure collectively humanity beats LLMs today, but compared to any single human, LLMs would obliterate them in terms of perceived creativity.
At an individual level, the speed and breadth of LLMs can indeed create the impression of "outshining" in creativity. However, human creativity possesses a unique dimension,emotional depth, personal experiences, and intuition that LLMs cannot fully replicate.
Collectively, yes. But sadly, this is me and most humans... fairly unremarkable
A stupid question with a stupid answer from a bad movie about a good book is not a good argument for what was commented. It's like responding with a straw man.
This platform is not just getting zaps or SATs, it's literally a learning place right? Why raining insults? If you don't want to engage on the question, why can't you just scroll passed the question? Or do you know it all..?
You felt offended by an offense that was not directed at you. You didn't write the script for the movie I offended, I imagine. The only reason you feel this way is because I said you used a scarecrow and that's not even an offense. If you don't want people to engage with your post and comment, don't post or comment.
apologize for hurting your feelings, sir
That's exactly what I've been talking about. AI does not reason, it has no creativity, it is just causal reactions within a logic. His creations are nothing more than aggregates of calculations in the form of language. Humans think, feel, ponder, and all of this based on neural connections on lived experiences. An emulation based on results of the human creation process is not creativity. AI cannot create new solutions to problems, whether mathematical or linguistic, if they do not have databases for this, humans do.
Thanks for your contribution
Your insight really count and thanks for sharing.
Derivative!!!
If you study how AlphaGeometry works, you will see that LLM part of it generates ideas that math part explores, and so going loop after loop. So yes, AI can be way more creative than an average human.
Your perspective is well noted.
The premise is wrong. LLMs: only contain information that was generated by humans.
There is no independent intelligence. Its a pattern extraction algo that has some random settings to jump to nearest neighbor nodes.
The constant impulse of humans to attribute agency to it, probably represents its greatest threat.
Thanks for your opinion, humans learn every day and no one knows it all.
Matt & Shane Gillis have a GREAT take on this: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/TF24ZYEQrRU
DESCARTESSS thettss geniusssss
Your response is helpful.
Thank you!
Thanks for your thoughts!
Just remixing
While A.I creativity is more procedural and trained, humans are flexible and unpredictable in how they approach creativity
#Fact... Nice take on this.