Are you saying you feel good for using and recommend custodial solutions ? Let’s put this clear pls
If are non-KYC and are used for for small payments at a daily basis, what's your problem? You are not keeping all your stash in one place, right?
Are even better, I can refill them anytime, from my node and when I pay I do not reveal too much info about my original sources.
I always use the 3 levels of stash of my BTC with mixed custodial and non-custodial solutions. My mobile device always have 3-4 LN wallets ready to pay, custodial or not.
Custodial is not bad as many wanted to present it as the mother of all demons. Be reasonable, some services is OK to be custodial, some not. If you know well how to use custodial services could be even a "smoke screen" against privacy snooping. But yes, not everybody knows how to use them well.
Not all "custodial services" are bad or against you. Example stacker.news, lntxbot.com and some others.
reply
My “problem” with using a custodial solution for a daily basis payment. Is that you are rebuilding in the mind of the newcomers the wrong ideas. People will relax them selves and will put more and more money into these services , what’s the point of this ? We have the technology available to get the things right from the beginning.
Of course anyone can do with their money what they prefer. But seem wrong to me when people using custodial solutions when they can just use a non custodial one.
reply
You are still using SN (custodial). Why are you still here?
reply
I don't hodl money here dude. I don't use these for daily payments. don't play the "idiot" card here, you know what I'm talking about. And I still use my visa card, PROMOTING custodial solutions is what I'm against.
reply
But don't you see how hypocrite you are? Using a VISA card but screaming to other "don't use custodial !" Just by being here, posting, you HAVE TO USE SN CUSTODIAL, each of your posts COST a sat taken from your CUSTODIAL SN account.
reply
dude go back and read the post I made, It seems you lost the idea.
reply