pull down to refresh

I get that. Did k00b just say it had to be at least 10 to balance out your 18 stacker count?
142 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 21 Aug
Yep, if the goal is to outlaw, downzappers need to zap more than 1 sat.
reply
if the goal is to outlaw
I was thinking about this point in relation to what @Scoresby said on another branch of this discussion:
In the case of downzaps versus boosts, it seems that erring on the side of allowing visibility is better than erring the other way.
Do downzaps have any effect on non-top-boost posts before they trigger the outlaw threshold? I.e. lower ranking on hot on the list view or comments?
reply
142 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 21 Aug
Yes, they downrank content until cum_zap_weight - cum_downzap_weight is sufficiently negative.
reply
Alright. To me, this means not so much that the downzap function itself is the cause of any the visibility issue when it comes to boosts, but more that the boosts are an all-or-nothing concept in terms of viz, that can only be countered by bidding war or - since today - be outlawed.
I'll have to think about this a bit more but that's where I'm at.
reply
Alrighty, downzapper set to 10.
reply