pull down to refresh
Looks like it's outlawed now, but top boost doesn't consider outlaw status I guess.
I'll ship a fix.
you've still got it
Memes
maketh
man
LOL good one!
I love instant memes.
Fixed. It's still the top boost in Wild West Mode but that's as intended.
I remember thinking about outlaws as I made the top boost mvp. I prefer demand response I guess.
Thought about the top boost demand-response theory. It would be a great way to maximize territory revenue to have scammer sats try to outbid honest boosts.
Morally, I think the downzap is better - because do we really want to make money off scammers trying to get victims?
I was pondering something else: Do downzaps go 70/30 to territory and rewards like fees? Would be better if these go 100% to rewards IMHO, because 70% is a huge incentive for territory owners to encourage crap content.
In the case of downzaps versus boosts, it seems that erring on the side of allowing visibility is better than erring the other way.
What I mean is: it's better to allow a scammer to boost and get visibility, than it is to allow a strong downzapper to hide content.
Reason: the tool we use to banish scammers can also be used by scammers to banish valuable content they don't want others to see.
Imagine a scenario where someone posts about a flaw in a project or bad behavior, if the owner of the project can banish such a post by heavily downzapping.
Don't we run greater risk to the community by allowing a strong power to hide information than we do by allowing a strong power to boost information?
This only works with brigades. So having an unpopular opinion against a mob of fanbois with high trust score will mess you up. But nothing prevents you from posting again? But what's the point if there is a non-receptive majority?
Information wins, just boosts don't?
Downzaps go 70/30 to territory revenue/rewards.
There's no incentive to downzap currently, so I don't think it's likely to be pathological. We have plans to incentivize them which might require a rethink.
If they would go 100% to rewards, it may already carry better incentive?
Good point!
I don't know if I've seen three labels on a post before...is this a record?
imagine if it was a "freebie" too and posted by a "bot"
But can a boost be a freebie?
chills
I've seen the outlawed label before when in wild west mode and on posts and comments I replied to.
but have you seen it with the top boost label?
Ah! Nope.
Thank you!
Now 35 zappers. Feels like a Sybil attack. Scammers be scamming. But shall anti scammers be anti scamming too?
The number of zappers is only part of it.
It's sum(zapper_trust*log10(zap_amount)) and sybils will have zapper_trust equal to zero.
Got it. Thank you for making me not read the code from an uber <3