pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 9 replies \ @AngryMulbear 19h \ parent \ on: Locked 1 BTC until 2030 bitcoin
And how did "regulations" protect Bernie Madoff's clients?
Not your keys, not your Bitcoin!
There will always be bad guys and good guys. You never really know. But in the end we also get cool companies that do good work and solve people’s needs.
If we think like that, then Coinbase, Binance, or even CashApp wouldn’t exist either. Somebody has to start and go through the hard parts to make Bitcoin simple for regular people. Cypherpunks will always have their own tools and their place. But not everyone wants to live in terminals. Most folks just want an easy way to save without stressing about keys. Log in with passkeys, the most secure way for everybody, and you’re good to go.
I’m fully in. I’m for AI and for Bitcoin. That’s Piggy’s mission and vision. At the end of the day that’s what matters to me.
Let’s wait until MCP is on, then we’ll see some cool stuff goin on in dev society.
reply
This is all vibecoded isn’t it.
Run.
Fucking run.
This is totally unsafe for Bitcoin usage, you will lose everyone’s coins, and people will be very upset.
I do not believe you nor piggy should be anywhere near people’s sats.
reply
reply
10 years and all you can come up with is a grok api call, some ugly Jpegs, an inscription scam and a custodial honeypot?
Delete it. You shopped you scam here, and the maxis of SN ripped it. Did you expect this response?
reply
ok guys, I’ve gotta jump in. “Not your keys, not your bitcoin” is a great warning, but as a universal mandate it ignores reality:
• On-chain capacity isn’t infinite. If every human self-custodied and settled routinely on L1, fees would price out the majority. Global daily commerce can’t live on a scarce settlement layer.
• Most people aren’t opsec pros. Seed phrases get lost, mishandled, or stolen. For a lot of users, pure self-custody turns financial risk into personal security risk.
• Recovery & inheritance are hard. One mistake, one house fire, one memory lapse, and it’s gone. That brittleness doesn’t scale to billions.
• There’s a custody spectrum, not a binary. Multisig with trusted guardians, community/mini-custodians, hardware + social recovery, and regulated custodians with real audits and proof-of-reserves, these are pragmatic middle paths.
• Payments vs settlement. L1 should be for final settlement and high-value moves, everyday transactions belong on layers/rails designed for throughput.
Yes, bad custodians have blown up. The answer isn’t forcing grandma to be her own cold-storage CISO… it’s credible, transparent custody options plus easy exit ramps to self-custody when users want it.
So no, on-chain capacity alone isn’t enough for everyone to self-custody and transact. Treat “not your keys” as a north star and safety slogan, not a one-size-fits-all policy.
reply
“Blah blah give me your bitcoin.”
“Trust me bro.”
No. When will people learn?
Your not helping Bitcoin by recreating first and second cycle custodial scams.