They tracked him via Gyft and an American(!) VPN; where he had used his real name, email and home address purchased with the stolen BTC? Which, by the way, were all stored on Dropbox account along with a spreadsheet of all his activity?
The criminal complaint alleges that Lichtenstein and Morgan employed numerous sophisticated laundering techniques, including using fictitious identities to set up online accounts; utilizing computer programs to automate transactions, a laundering technique that allows for many transactions to take place in a short period of time; depositing the stolen funds into accounts at a variety of virtual currency exchanges and darknet markets and then withdrawing the funds, which obfuscates the trail of the transaction history by breaking up the fund flow; converting bitcoin to other forms of virtual currency, including anonymity-enhanced virtual currency (AEC), in a practice known as “chain hopping”; and using U.S.-based business accounts to legitimize their banking activity.
I think I would have had my paper returned to me in grammar class if had I written a single sentence that was that long.
I thnk I would get kicked off Crypto Twitter if I referred to Monero, for instance, as being an "anonymity-enhanced virtual currency (AEC)".
There has been some chatter by those sleuthing the sleuthers, but I don't follow it closely.
What the authorities and these chain analysis orgs tell us they did (which sounds like magic) is certainly in actuality where they had KYC exchange data and high value amounts that didn't correspond with that person's story (also known as a lifestyle audit). So they then observe more closely and if more shady stuff found, then they start to make links, very likely using data collection methods like subpeonaing the couple's accounts and hacking their devices (if needed) or whatever, to know if their suspicions were actually on to something. Just that in this case it, allegedly, led to a monster size theft.
Who knows.
Moral of the story, if you make yourself a target, you will be targeted.
The remainder of the stolen funds, now worth $4.1 billion, were moved to a new wallet just last week, the first movement of these funds since the 2016 theft. This appears to represent the seizure of the bitcoins from Lichtenstein and Morgan, by law enforcement.
A diagram from the arrest warrant, showing how the stolen bitcoins were traced through Alphabay and another exchange - and onwards to a further exchange account in the name of Lichtenstein.
Number of bitcoins from the Bitfinex hack received each month by the largest destinations. A significant amount of time can elapse between the funds leaving the theft wallet, and reaching one of these destinations.
Ilya Lichtenstein, 34, and his wife, Heather Morgan, 31, both of New York, New York, are scheduled to make their initial appearances in federal court today at 3:00 p.m. in Manhattan.
Feds are stacking!
deleted by author
Is it true they had the keys in plaintext on Google Drive? Crazy.
The DOJ report says the keys were in an encrypted file... so I'm guessing weak password or NSA/FBI knows how to break that specific cypher.
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
Posts from elsewhere on this topic:
The Largest Financial Seizure Ever' - DoJ Recovers Billions In Bitcoin From 2016 Bitfinex Hack, Couple Arrested
https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/largest-financial-seizure-ever-doj-announces-billions-bitcoin-2016-bitfinex-hack-recovered
I think I would have had my paper returned to me in grammar class if had I written a single sentence that was that long.
I thnk I would get kicked off Crypto Twitter if I referred to Monero, for instance, as being an "anonymity-enhanced virtual currency (AEC)".
Any info on how this got tracked? Ie. hops between Btc and Monero?
There has been some chatter by those sleuthing the sleuthers, but I don't follow it closely.
What the authorities and these chain analysis orgs tell us they did (which sounds like magic) is certainly in actuality where they had KYC exchange data and high value amounts that didn't correspond with that person's story (also known as a lifestyle audit). So they then observe more closely and if more shady stuff found, then they start to make links, very likely using data collection methods like subpeonaing the couple's accounts and hacking their devices (if needed) or whatever, to know if their suspicions were actually on to something. Just that in this case it, allegedly, led to a monster size theft.
Who knows.
Moral of the story, if you make yourself a target, you will be targeted.
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
Another article:
DOJ Recovers $3.6 Billion In Bitcoin Stolen In Bitfinex Hack
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/doj-recovers-36-billion-in-bitcoin-stolen-in-bitfinex-hack
deleted by author
deleted by author
--
view on twitter.comYou couldn't make this up!
Got Burnout? This Tech CEO Thinks You Should Try Rapping
https://www.forbes.com/sites/heathermorgan/2019/04/30/got-burnout-tech-ceo-try-rapping
deleted by author
deleted by author
The DOJ's Press Release:
Two Arrested for Alleged Conspiracy to Launder $4.5 Billion in Stolen Cryptocurrency
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/two-arrested-alleged-conspiracy-launder-45-billion-stolen-cryptocurrency
Related:
US DOJ: Two Arrested for Alleged Conspiracy to Launder $4.5 Billion in Stolen Cryptocurrency
#10790
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1470211/download
DOJ seizes 3.6bn in stolen bitcoin
#10784
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-08/doj-seizes-3-6-billion-in-bitcoin-stolen-in-2016-bitfinex-hack
Related:
Issue #1159: Bitfinex hackers have been caught | Marty's Bent
#10881
https://tftc.io/martys-bent/issue-1159-bitfinex-hackers-have-been-caught
Related:
2016 Bitfinix Hacked Coins Seized by Feds, Two Arrested
#10781
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/02/08/bitfinex-hack-bitcoin-arrests/
Related:
Justice Department retrieves $3.6 billion in Bitcoin from 2016 hack
#10982
https://www.wealthiertoday.com/news/justice-department-retrieves-3-6-billion-in-bitcoin-from-2016-hack/
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
Old (2016) article following the Bitfinex hack:
What the Bitfinex Hack Means for Bitcoin Multi-Sig Security
https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2016/08/05/what-the-bitfinex-hack-means-for-bitcoin-multi-sig-security/
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
Lichtenstein, Lichtenstein!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=86&v=heFkmvxZytY
That's the first thing that popped into my head, sorry.
deleted by author
deleted by author